“Morality Statement: No one has the right to tell me what is right and what is wrong“
“No one has the right to tell me what is right and what is wrong”, “I have the right to do whatever I want as long as I am not hurting anyone”, “This may be true for you but not for me”. These statements, underlying our culture’s mindset, have become the backbone of our moral system. This worldview, Moral Relativism, has become the default way of thinking today. It is the unofficial creed of our culture in America. But what is Moral Relativism? Are there any Moral Absolutes? Is morality defined by our culture? Is Moral Relativism logically sustainable? What about the dominating virtue of tolerance? Let us discuss.
Morality And Truth
Moral Relativism begins with the presumption that there is no God, no transcendent agent imposing upon us a standard of right and wrong. As a result, there is no objective right and wrong. Morality and truth depend upon the person and the circumstances. To say that you think something is right or wrong does not say anything about the essential action, only your feelings about that action.
But if Relativism were true, then there must be something to which all things are relative yet is not relative itself. In other words, something has to be absolute before we can see that everything else is relative to it. That is the nature of relations; they exist between two or more things. Nothing can be relative by itself, and if everything else is relative, then no other relations are real. There has to be something which does not change by which we can measure the change in everything else.
Objective Moral Judgments
Measurement is impossible without absolutes. Even moral relativists make such statements as, “The world is getting better (or worse).” But it is not possible to know it is getting “better” unless we know what is “Best.” Less than perfect is only measurable against a Perfect. Hence, all objective moral judgments imply an absolute moral standard by which they can be measured.
“Morality is an obligation, for which a person is accountable.”
Moral absolutes are unavoidable. Statements such as “You should never say never,” “You should always avoid using always,” are absolute moral statements. So, there is no way to avoid moral absolutes without affirming a moral absolute. Morality is prescriptive (an “ought”), not merely descriptive (an “is”). Morality is an obligation, for which a person is accountable.
Total moral relativism becomes self-refuting. By: George Bassilios | Deacon at St Antonius Coptic Orthodox Church ~ San Francisco, California USA – #timelesstruth
Columnists: COPTICNN™ award-winning columnists are a fundamental pillar of our coverage. They range in their interests from orthodoxy, faith, politics, to world affairs, to business, to the arts, to the way we live. No matter the issue, they are always in the middle of our Christian discourse. They are trusted by our readers and followed by many Coptic Orthodox Christians worldwide. Influential, provocative, and engaging, our columnists provide insights and analysis that can’t be found elsewhere, making them a prime destination for WORLD readers.